<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RIAA earns itself $1.92 million in MN court case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.perfectporridge.com/2009/06/19/riaa-earns-itself-1-92-million-in-mn-court-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.perfectporridge.com/2009/06/19/riaa-earns-itself-1-92-million-in-mn-court-case/</link>
	<description>Music, Minneapolis, Mutiny</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 04:06:49 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: perfectporridge</title>
		<link>http://www.perfectporridge.com/2009/06/19/riaa-earns-itself-1-92-million-in-mn-court-case/comment-page-1/#comment-48967</link>
		<dc:creator>perfectporridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 23:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.perfectporridge.com/?p=3605#comment-48967</guid>
		<description>Since nearly $2 million is impossible for your average mother of four to pay, they don&#039;t really expect to get that much. It&#039;s so high because the RIAA is trying to make this an example to stop people from downloading illegal music.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Instead, I wish they would reevaluate their business model. Selling $15 cds when consumers can get easily find content for free online isn&#039;t going to stop people from downloading. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hell, maybe they should ask Obama for a bailout. It&#039;s working for other companies who have an ancient, failed business model they don&#039;t want to change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since nearly $2 million is impossible for your average mother of four to pay, they don&#39;t really expect to get that much. It&#39;s so high because the RIAA is trying to make this an example to stop people from downloading illegal music.</p>
<p>Instead, I wish they would reevaluate their business model. Selling $15 cds when consumers can get easily find content for free online isn&#39;t going to stop people from downloading. </p>
<p>Hell, maybe they should ask Obama for a bailout. It&#39;s working for other companies who have an ancient, failed business model they don&#39;t want to change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Borangutan &#187; Jammie Thomas-Rasset vs. the RIAA</title>
		<link>http://www.perfectporridge.com/2009/06/19/riaa-earns-itself-1-92-million-in-mn-court-case/comment-page-1/#comment-48965</link>
		<dc:creator>Borangutan &#187; Jammie Thomas-Rasset vs. the RIAA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 20:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.perfectporridge.com/?p=3605#comment-48965</guid>
		<description>[...] RIAA earns itself $1.92 million in MN court case &#8211; Perfect Porridge [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] RIAA earns itself $1.92 million in MN court case &#8211; Perfect Porridge [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrystalk</title>
		<link>http://www.perfectporridge.com/2009/06/19/riaa-earns-itself-1-92-million-in-mn-court-case/comment-page-1/#comment-48966</link>
		<dc:creator>chrystalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 20:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.perfectporridge.com/?p=3605#comment-48966</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand. Why are the charges so high?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t understand. Why are the charges so high?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
