<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SXSW Interactive Day 2: Audience Revolt at the Metrics Panel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.perfectporridge.com/2008/03/08/1648/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.perfectporridge.com/2008/03/08/1648/</link>
	<description>Music, Minneapolis, Mutiny</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:51:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Virtual Kids Games</title>
		<link>http://www.perfectporridge.com/2008/03/08/1648/comment-page-1/#comment-49146</link>
		<dc:creator>Virtual Kids Games</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 20:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.perfectporridge.com/2008/03/08/1648/#comment-49146</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s important to know your audience when planning a presentation. I guess not enough thought went into this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s important to know your audience when planning a presentation. I guess not enough thought went into this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SXSW &#8211; Has it jumped the shark? &#171; The Image Lab</title>
		<link>http://www.perfectporridge.com/2008/03/08/1648/comment-page-1/#comment-49119</link>
		<dc:creator>SXSW &#8211; Has it jumped the shark? &#171; The Image Lab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.perfectporridge.com/2008/03/08/1648/#comment-49119</guid>
		<description>[...] expect from the panel. Since the audience was filled with a bunch of social media savvy people, they all started talking to each other about this on Meebo. Unbeknownst to the panelist and traditional journalists in the room, an entire conversation about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] expect from the panel. Since the audience was filled with a bunch of social media savvy people, they all started talking to each other about this on Meebo. Unbeknownst to the panelist and traditional journalists in the room, an entire conversation about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Porridge</title>
		<link>http://www.perfectporridge.com/2008/03/08/1648/comment-page-1/#comment-27939</link>
		<dc:creator>Porridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.perfectporridge.com/2008/03/08/1648/#comment-27939</guid>
		<description>By the time I got back to my notes most folks had already done a pretty great job of &lt;a href=&quot;http://ypulse.com/archives/2008/03/sxsw_what_teens.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;summing up the panel&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the time I got back to my notes most folks had already done a pretty great job of <a href="http://ypulse.com/archives/2008/03/sxsw_what_teens.php" rel="nofollow">summing up the panel</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nai</title>
		<link>http://www.perfectporridge.com/2008/03/08/1648/comment-page-1/#comment-27922</link>
		<dc:creator>nai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.perfectporridge.com/2008/03/08/1648/#comment-27922</guid>
		<description>Hi there!

Found your site through googling for social media metrics. Was wondering about the notes on &#039;teen marketing&#039;. Will you guys be doing a write up on that soon? Would be great if you&#039;re sharing the knowledge. 

Cheers

Nai</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there!</p>
<p>Found your site through googling for social media metrics. Was wondering about the notes on &#8216;teen marketing&#8217;. Will you guys be doing a write up on that soon? Would be great if you&#8217;re sharing the knowledge. </p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Nai</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can You Hear Me Up the Back? &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Twitter Rebellion: A short history of digital speech interruption</title>
		<link>http://www.perfectporridge.com/2008/03/08/1648/comment-page-1/#comment-27327</link>
		<dc:creator>Can You Hear Me Up the Back? &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Twitter Rebellion: A short history of digital speech interruption</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.perfectporridge.com/2008/03/08/1648/#comment-27327</guid>
		<description>[...] In the case of at least one conference in the US, they eventually rose up in rebellion and demanded the panel moderator get back on topic. The moderator brushed it off, causing an on-line storm of backchat and resentment: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In the case of at least one conference in the US, they eventually rose up in rebellion and demanded the panel moderator get back on topic. The moderator brushed it off, causing an on-line storm of backchat and resentment: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Back channels lead to revolt at the SXSW Zuckerberg keynote &#124; Lava Row, Social media consulting, strategy and web marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.perfectporridge.com/2008/03/08/1648/comment-page-1/#comment-26956</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Back channels lead to revolt at the SXSW Zuckerberg keynote &#124; Lava Row, Social media consulting, strategy and web marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 19:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.perfectporridge.com/2008/03/08/1648/#comment-26956</guid>
		<description>[...] Actually, this was the second time mob rule took over at SXSW - it also happened at the metrics panel on day two. This backlash is really less about Mark Zuckerberg and Sarah Lacy, and is totally a microcosm of what happens every day within disruptive social mediums, whether it&#8217;s a blogger calling out bad customer service at Dell, or a Taco Bell patron posting a video of rats running around the kitchen on YouTube. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Actually, this was the second time mob rule took over at SXSW &#8211; it also happened at the metrics panel on day two. This backlash is really less about Mark Zuckerberg and Sarah Lacy, and is totally a microcosm of what happens every day within disruptive social mediums, whether it&#8217;s a blogger calling out bad customer service at Dell, or a Taco Bell patron posting a video of rats running around the kitchen on YouTube. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Thomas &#187; Amazon.com Announces TextBuyIt</title>
		<link>http://www.perfectporridge.com/2008/03/08/1648/comment-page-1/#comment-24665</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Thomas &#187; Amazon.com Announces TextBuyIt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 10:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.perfectporridge.com/2008/03/08/1648/#comment-24665</guid>
		<description>[...] I never fully realized the appeal of this instantaneous communication until this year&#8217;s SXSW Interactive conference. I was following someone from Minnesota who was there and witnessed the takeover of a panel that was facilitated by backchannels created in Twitter and Meebo. I didn&#8217;t get a detailed account, but sitting in my office in Minneapolis, I was privy to something very interesting occurring in Austin, TX. I&#8217;ll be very surprised if I don&#8217;t read about it in Wired next month. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I never fully realized the appeal of this instantaneous communication until this year&#8217;s SXSW Interactive conference. I was following someone from Minnesota who was there and witnessed the takeover of a panel that was facilitated by backchannels created in Twitter and Meebo. I didn&#8217;t get a detailed account, but sitting in my office in Minneapolis, I was privy to something very interesting occurring in Austin, TX. I&#8217;ll be very surprised if I don&#8217;t read about it in Wired next month. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dear Sleazeball Politicians, We&#8217;re Taking Back Control of OUR Country, Like We&#8217;ve Been Taking Control of Our Spaces &#124; Apokalypse Software Corp.</title>
		<link>http://www.perfectporridge.com/2008/03/08/1648/comment-page-1/#comment-23796</link>
		<dc:creator>Dear Sleazeball Politicians, We&#8217;re Taking Back Control of OUR Country, Like We&#8217;ve Been Taking Control of Our Spaces &#124; Apokalypse Software Corp.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.perfectporridge.com/2008/03/08/1648/#comment-23796</guid>
		<description>[...] And we&#8217;re taking charge again, as you can see. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And we&#8217;re taking charge again, as you can see. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: When Did We All Become Eagles Fans? &#187; The Buzz Bin</title>
		<link>http://www.perfectporridge.com/2008/03/08/1648/comment-page-1/#comment-23768</link>
		<dc:creator>When Did We All Become Eagles Fans? &#187; The Buzz Bin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.perfectporridge.com/2008/03/08/1648/#comment-23768</guid>
		<description>[...] Arrington dubbed it a &quot;witch burning.&quot; A similar hijacking behavior pattern broke out at the metrics panel. And it&#8217;s hard not to think of last winter&#8217;s Gizmodo hijacking incident at CES. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Arrington dubbed it a &quot;witch burning.&quot; A similar hijacking behavior pattern broke out at the metrics panel. And it&#8217;s hard not to think of last winter&#8217;s Gizmodo hijacking incident at CES. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emily</title>
		<link>http://www.perfectporridge.com/2008/03/08/1648/comment-page-1/#comment-23724</link>
		<dc:creator>emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.perfectporridge.com/2008/03/08/1648/#comment-23724</guid>
		<description>Michael,

My point was simply that this recurring theme of audience dissatisfaction should not be ignored. I never meant to condone behavior such as coughing in unison -- that is rude and silly. I agree that pushback must be civil, and mostly it was.

The &quot;Are Logos Irrelevant?&quot; panel, for example, was a model of appropriate pushback: audience members lined up at the mike and presented *brief* and *logical* evidence that the panelists had failed to make the case for their provocative premise.  In the &quot;Design Eye&quot; panel, there was very little audible pushback (in fact one Q&amp;A participant who tried to stir things up was promptly hushed by the rest of the room) -- but the sudden disappointment during the &quot;reveal&quot; was like a blanket descending on the room, and it threw off the presenters who were expecting whoops of applause. Herasimchuk&#039;s response was not to a belligerent audience member but to someone who had waited in line to ask the perfectly reasonable question of how their navigation-challenged sample pages could be integrated into the larger site. 

Yes, conference speakers can be boring. There were some of those at SXSW, too, and people walked out on them quietly. But when speakers are ill-prepared, arrogant, or deceptive, the question is no longer how to provide avenues for feedback, but how to make sure that people do not become angry at the perceived theft of their time and money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>My point was simply that this recurring theme of audience dissatisfaction should not be ignored. I never meant to condone behavior such as coughing in unison &#8212; that is rude and silly. I agree that pushback must be civil, and mostly it was.</p>
<p>The &#8220;Are Logos Irrelevant?&#8221; panel, for example, was a model of appropriate pushback: audience members lined up at the mike and presented *brief* and *logical* evidence that the panelists had failed to make the case for their provocative premise.  In the &#8220;Design Eye&#8221; panel, there was very little audible pushback (in fact one Q&amp;A participant who tried to stir things up was promptly hushed by the rest of the room) &#8212; but the sudden disappointment during the &#8220;reveal&#8221; was like a blanket descending on the room, and it threw off the presenters who were expecting whoops of applause. Herasimchuk&#8217;s response was not to a belligerent audience member but to someone who had waited in line to ask the perfectly reasonable question of how their navigation-challenged sample pages could be integrated into the larger site. </p>
<p>Yes, conference speakers can be boring. There were some of those at SXSW, too, and people walked out on them quietly. But when speakers are ill-prepared, arrogant, or deceptive, the question is no longer how to provide avenues for feedback, but how to make sure that people do not become angry at the perceived theft of their time and money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
